[expr.new] Extend example for new-expressions with zero size arrays #7055
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jensmaurer
requested changes
Jun 11, 2024
Eisenwave
force-pushed
the
example-new-zero
branch
from
19ccaf0 to
88c4fd3
Compare
jensmaurer
reviewed
Jun 11, 2024
Eisenwave
force-pushed
the
example-new-zero
branch
from
88c4fd3 to
a5d04d6
Compare
|
@jensmaurer could you have another look? |
jensmaurer
approved these changes
Aug 5, 2024
|
This is nice, thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Someone has told me that they've been reading [expr.new] p6 wrong; namely in a way that implies
new int[0]is ill-formed.It's not immediately obvious that it is okay even though the wording says that something shall not be zero.